CT Gov Lamont: Don't blame me, blame the Federal Government

In his February 4, 2026 State of the State address, Governor Ned Lamont significantly shifted his tone, moving away from his characteristic moderate pragmatism to deliver a sharp critique of the federal government. He explicitly framed Washington’s policies—particularly regarding immigration and fiscal cuts—as the primary drivers of economic and social anxiety in Connecticut.

Rebukes of Federal Enforcement. Lamont directed his most severe criticism toward U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), positioning Connecticut as a "bulwark", protecting residents against Washington tactics:

"We have perhaps the best-trained police force in the world, making Connecticut one of the very safest states. ICE is just the opposite. They see the world as us versus them. They are not trained to de-escalate—I think they are barely trained at all."

"They hide behind a mask. They come to Connecticut, and Minneapolis, to arrest people outside of schools, courthouses, often based upon the color of their skin."

"ICE, everywhere you go uninvited, violence follows. Go home. We're keeping Connecticut safe without you."

"That young mother shot twice in the head in Minneapolis. The White House called her a domestic terrorist. She reminded me of my daughter."

"Those kids at Wilbur Cross High School in New Haven—we call them Dreamers; The White House calls them criminal aliens."

Blaming Federal "Chaos" to Justify State Spending. Lamont argued that Connecticut must increase its own spending specifically to shield residents from federal "instability:"

He requested an extension of the Emergency State Response Reserve (originally $500M, now with $330.8 million remaining) through fiscal year 2027. He officially declared an "existence of extraordinary circumstances," stating this was necessary to "mitigate any action, or inaction, by the federal government that results in a reduction in funding for any program in this State."

To manage high costs related to "national economic uncertainty," Lamont proposed a one-time tax rebate of $200 for individuals and $400 for married couples. While he framed this as relief for "skyrocketing" energy costs, he linked those costs to federal policy and "on-again, off-again tariffs."

Between the Lines: The Governor hopes to distract the Connecticut locals who are angry over skyrocketing utility bills and high cost of living by framing the White House as the primary source of Connecticut's social and economic woes. However, encouraging the blocking of federal immigration enforcement and issuing a paltry $200 one-time energy rebate is more likely to cause residents to question the Governor's priorities.

Story here