Connecticut's No Excuse Absentee Ballot Law Falls Flat Without Signature Verification

On May 19, 2026, Connecticut’s Public Act 26-42 was signed, granting "absentee ballots for all," officially removing the requirement to provide an excuse to vote by mail. In reality, this changes very little; election officials never verified the truthfulness of those checkbox excuses anyway.

State Representative Matt Blumenthal (D) and other legislative proponents spent significant time this session on this bill, stating, "Every voter deserves to cast their ballot freely, fairly, and without fear... [This bill] provides absentee voting for all and the nation's strongest protections against intimidation or interference." And yet, they completely ignored Connecticut’s most glaring election integrity gap: signature verification.

The Signature Loophole

Nowhere in the current Connecticut process is a Town Clerk required to check if the signature on an absentee application or ballot matches the voter’s registration card. Instead, the law limits officials to checking merely for the presence of a signature. For example, if a ballot is issued to John Wayne and the return envelope is signed "Marilyn Monroe," election officials are legally required to accept it as long as the line isn't blank.

Connecticut at the Bottom Nationwide

According to data compiled by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), the vast majority of the country utilizes strict security checkpoints that Connecticut lacks:

• Signature Verification (32 States & Puerto Rico): The standard practice across most of the U.S. (including states like Colorado, Florida, Nebraska, and Utah) is to actively verify that the signature on the ballot matches the state's voter records.

• Witness/Notary Requirements (8 States): States like Alabama, North Carolina, and Wisconsin require at least one witness or a notary to sign the ballot alongside the voter.

• The Bare Minimum (9 States & D.C.): Connecticut sits in a bottom-tier minority of states—including Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont—that only check to see if the envelope is signed, skipping verification entirely.

Past Excuses No Longer Hold Water

In the past, opponents excused this lack of scrutiny by claiming that manual signature comparison is too time-consuming and unreliable for busy town clerks. But that excuse no longer holds water. In an era of advanced scanning technologies and automated verification, there is no reason Connecticut cannot run mail-in ballots through modern signature-matching software.

Between the Lines: Forget no excuse absentee ballots—there is absolutely no excuse for our lack of real signature verification.

Story here